The issuance of a credit card to plaintiff was an offer to extend to him an open line of credit. The plaintiff’s acceptance of that offer subjected him to the terms of the credit card agreement, which permitted the issuer to amend, modify, or terminate the credit terms. The annual fee paid was not consideration

Defendant, a general contractor, served as project expediter on a major construction project. Plaintiff, another co-prime contractor on the job, claimed that defendant was responsible for damages it had incurred because the project was delayed. Following a trial, the Court found the plaintiff had not proven the essential elements of a delay claim, which are

The Court discusses a variety of approachs to zoning, including contract zoning, spot zoning, single purpose zoning, conditional zoning, and conditional use district zoning. Due process requirements are discussed as well. The Court determines that the City of Charlotte’s system of conditional use zoning violated the applicable statute because it did not require the issuance

Plaintiffs’ claims against a health insurer for charging excessive rates were barred by the filed rate doctrine. The filed rate doctrine exists to prevent courts from intruding on the authority vested in administrative agencies by the legislature.

Full Opinion

This case involved the Business Court’s review of the disciplinary procedures of a voluntary membership organization (the Asheboro-Randolph Realtors Association). The Court found that some procedural due process was necessary before a member could be expelled (relying on precedent of the North Carolina Court of Appeals), and determined that plaintiff had been given fundamental due