Defendant sought a "prosecution bond," pursuant to N.C.G.S. §1-109, against the allegations made by plaintiff, a pro se litigant. The Court held that it was required to consider "(1) the relative merits of the case; (2) whether the costs in the case will be substantial; (3) the evidence, if any, of the plaintiff’s inability to
Case Database
Burgess v. American Express Company, Inc., 2007 NCBC 15 (N.C. Super. Ct. May 21, 2007)(Diaz)
Plaintiff sued a large number of defendants, arguing that they had caused advertising messages (in the form of pop-up ads) to be sent to him over his computer. The Court held, construing the allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, that he had stated a claim for trespass to chattels under North Carolina…
Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman, PLLC v. Brewer, 2007 NCBC 14 (N.C. Super. May 8, 2007)(Jolly)
Plaintiffs left their law firm, a PLLC, to start a new firm. They sought their share of the value of contingent fee cases being handled by the old firm. The old firm first contended that the plaintiffs had no standing, since they had withdrawn from the old firm before filing their action., and the North…
Teague v. Bayer AG, 2007 NCBC 12 (N.C. Super. Ct. May 7, 2007)(Tennille)
The Court, again, considered the issue of indirect purchaser standing. It reiterated the factors it looks to in determining whether there is such standing, as articulated in its opinion in Crouch v. Crompton Corp.
Crouch had involved one product, tires, but this case involved ethylene propylene diene monomer, which the Court observed might be used…
Club Car, Inc. v. The Dow Chemical Company, 2007 NCBC 10 (N.C. Super. May 3, 2007)(Diaz)
The Court grappled in this case with what it referred to as "the mysteries of the economic loss doctrine." The Court identified six "guideposts" regarding the scope of doctrine in North Carolina: (1) a tort action will generally not lie against a party to a contract who simply fails to perform the terms of the…
Blitz v. Xpress Image, Inc., 2007 NCBC 9 (N.C. Super. Apr. 13, 2007)(Diaz)
The Court considered a rarity here, a Motion to Dismiss an appeal. Trial courts have jurisdiction to consider such motions until the Record on Appeal is filed.
The Court granted the Motion to Dismiss because plaintiff had failed to take various actions required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure, including ordering a transcript, contacting opposing…
Green v. Short, 2007 NCBC 8 (N.C. Super. Mar. 9, 2007)(Diaz)
The Court considered in this case the scope of an arbitrator’s authority with regard to disputes involving a North Carolina LLC. It first determined that the interpretation of the arbitration clause before it was subject to the Federal Arbitration Act, because the contract was a "transaction involving commerce."
It held that whether a dispute is…
Wachovia Capital Partners, LLC v. Frank Harvey Investment Family Limited Partnership, 2007 NCBC 7 (N.C. Super. Ct. Mar. 5, 2007)(Tennille)
Defendant, via a counterclaim, sought damages as a result of a concluded merger involving a Delaware LLC. The Court held that the decision whether to merge belonged to the Management Committee of the LLC, and that it would review that decision pursuant to the Business Judgment Rule.
Defendant contended that company insiders "stood on both…
Wachovia Insurance Services, Inc. v. McGuirt, 2007 NCBC 3 (N.C. Super. Ct. Feb. 13, 2007)(Diaz)
Plaintiff’s former employee was subject to restrictive covenants in an Amended Employment Agreement. He was also subject, however, to what he claimed were conflicting restrictions in a subsequently executed Stock Purchase Agreement. The former employee asserted that the claims under the Amended Employment Agreement should be dismissed.
The Court denied the Motion and struck the…
Media Network, Inc. v. Mullen Advertising, Inc., 2007 NCBC 1 (N.C. Super. Ct. Jan. 19, 2007)(Diaz)
The issue here was whether the parties had reached an agreement by which defendant was to pay fees to plaintiff for managing an advertising program. Plaintiff alleged that the agreement was "non-cancellable" for a term of one year. The Court found that the correspondence relied upon by plaintiff did not establish a binding contract. Although…